Showing posts with label Progressives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressives. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Progressive Agenda Cries Foul on Supreme Court Campaign Ruling: Remains Silent on Comcast – Time Warner Merger

Well it has been a while since anything really motivated me to post to my blog, but these items brought forth a need to ask why?  Why is the public so silent to the real loss of independent thought, personal choice and diversity?  These recent items in the national news require the reader to look for the nexus between political parties, media monopolies and big money influence over politics and social issues.
The media would have us fearful of the ability for individuals to give privately to political candidates of their own choice, but no fear is sown for mega-media monopolization.  Over the past ten years the progressive mafia have made it their business to whack anyone who they perceive to be a threat to their agenda.  Look at what happened to a Brendan Eich, CEO of Mozilla.  The fascist behavior and intolerance is on full display.  Pay attention!  Just like the actions of Mozzilla to one of their own, Time Warner and Comcast have deep ties to the Progressive Agenda and all who fail to grasp the danger of too big to fail in media, need to do their homework on how the progressive agenda is steam rolling America into a form of tyranny that she may not recover from.
Pay attention America.  While the main stream media cries foul with the left side of their mouth, their right side silently grins at the perceived brilliance of their actions that go unnoticed or heralded by their supposed opponents.  I ask why?  Do you?
YiT ~ Shelly

Supreme Court strikes down overall limits on political contributions

Published April 02, 2014 - FILE: June 20, 2013: The U.S. Supreme Court building, in Washington, D.C.AP
Supreme Court BIG TOP.jpgWASHINGTON –  The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled Wednesday that limits on the total amount of money individuals can give to candidates, political parties and political action committees are unconstitutional.
The major ruling, which was hailed by Republican congressional leaders as a First Amendment victory, removes the cap on contributions, which was set at $123,200 for 2014. It does not change limits, though, on individual contributions for president or Congress, currently set at $2,600 per election.
Chief Justice John Roberts announced the decision, which split the court's liberal and conservative justices.
“Money in politics may at times seem repugnant to some, but so too does much of what the First Amendment vigorously protects,” Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “If the First Amendment protects flag burning, funeral protests and Nazi parades – despite the profound offense such spectacles cause – it surely protects political campaign speech despite popular opinion.”
The overall limits "intrude without justification on a citizen's ability to exercise `the most fundamental First Amendment activities,"' Roberts said, quoting from the court's seminal 1976 campaign finance ruling in Buckley v. Valeo.  Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the outcome of the case, but wrote separately to say that he would have gone further and wiped away all contribution limits.
Others, though, described the ruling as a major blow to vital campaign finance rules. 
Continue reading article at this link.

How Comcast Bought the Democratic Party

A huge merger brought about by high-intensity lobbying goes unopposed.

By Matthew Continetti 
 

 


The communications giant Comcast announced in February that it would buy Time Warner Cable for $45 billion, creating the largest cable provider in America, with more than 33 million customers. That is about one third of the U.S. cable- and satellite-television market. FCC approval is required for the merger to go into effect. Critics of the deal say it would lessen competition and lead to even shoddier customer service. They are probably right, as all of us will soon find out, because there is little chance the merger will be stopped. Comcast, Time Warner, and their political fixers have spent years preparing for this moment — by buying off the Democratic party.
Comcast, which employs more than 100 lobbyists, spent almost $19 million last year on lobbying activities. Its president and CEO, Brian L. Roberts, is a golf buddy of President Obama’s, and a Democratic donor who has contributed thousands of dollars not only to the president’s campaigns, but also to the Democratic party of Pennsylvania, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the DNC Services Corporation, and to Steny Hoyer, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Bob Casey. Roberts’s executive vice president, David Cohen, is a former aide to Democratic bigwig Ed Rendell. Cohen skirts lobbying regulations through loopholes, has raised more than $2 million for Obama since 2007, and in 2011 hosted a DNC fundraiser at which the president called him “friend.” Cohen has visited the White House 14 times since 2010, including two visits to the Oval Office. He attended the recent dinner for President Hollande of France.
Cohen plays a major role in the Comcast Foundation, which has disbursed more than $3 billion since 2001, primarily to “groups that serve African-Americans, Latinos, and Asians” and other segments of the Democratic coalition. You will be surprised to learn that many of the groups to whom the Comcast Foundation has donated now support the proposed merger. Of the $33 million Comcast has spent on political campaigns since 1989, more than half, or some $18 million, has gone to Democrats. Barack Obama is No. 1 on the list of the top ten recipients of Comcast’s largesse. There are four Republicans on the list.
Continue reading article at this link.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Welcome to America–How May We Spy on You?

It has truly become disturbing that “We the People,” the citizens of America are not demanding that unwarranted searches and privacy violations, must be stopped immediately.    The Federal Governments actions to inventory the private citizen’s of this Country is an appalling fact that this nation will regret and our children, or grandchildren and ever-after they will ask us; “Why did everyone do nothing to stop this?”  Of course, since they’ve never truly experienced the type of freedom I had in my youth, they’ll never know what was stolen from them.

If we do not protect all of your civil rights, we will soon have no civil rights.  Come on America, wake-up and tell your Senators and Congress to stop this madness.

YiT – Shelly


Feds tell Web firms to turn over user account passwords

Secret demands mark escalation in Internet surveillance by the federal government through gaining access to user passwords, which are typically stored in encrypted form.

Declan McCullagh by Declan McCullagh / July 25, 2013 11:26 AM PDT

(Credit: Photo illustration by James Martin/CNET)

The U.S. government has demanded that major Internet companies divulge users' stored passwords, according to two industry sources familiar with these orders, which represent an escalation in surveillance techniques that has not previously been disclosed.

If the government is able to determine a person's password, which is typically stored in encrypted form, the credential could be used to log in to an account to peruse confidential correspondence or even impersonate the user. Obtaining it also would aid in deciphering encrypted devices in situations where passwords are reused.

"I've certainly seen them ask for passwords," said one Internet industry source who spoke on condition of anonymity. "We push back."

A second person who has worked at a large Silicon Valley company confirmed that it received legal requests from the federal government for stored passwords. Companies "really heavily scrutinize" these requests, the person said. "There's a lot of 'over my dead body.'"

Some of the government orders demand not only a user's password but also the encryption algorithm and the so-called salt, according to a person familiar with the requests. A salt is a random string of letters or numbers used to make it more difficult to reverse the encryption process and determine the original password. Other orders demand the secret question codes often associated with user accounts.

"This is one of those unanswered legal questions: Is there any circumstance under which they could get password information?"
--Jennifer Granick, Stanford University

Click here to read the full article.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Doctor Who Did 1,200 Abortions Tells Congress to Ban Them

Through the many years I have been posting here, I have not posted any articles that are pro or anti-abortion.  This site is dedicated to highlight progressive policies that I believe are deleterious to “We the People.”  Today I found an article through The Drudge Report that could change a lot of minds on the topic of abortion.

Now I want to bring you back to what’s happening with Obamacare and the mandate by this abuse of power, that all insurers must provide abortion coverage.

Please read and share this article with others.  It could mean life or death for many innocent lives to come.

YiT ~  Shelly


Doctor Who Did 1,200 Abortions Tells Congress to Ban Them

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/23/13 12:52 PM

Dr. Anthony Levatino is a pro-life physician from New Mexico but, before having a change of heart on the issue of abortion he was an OBGYN who also performed abortions.

Levatino did as many as 1,200 abortions — some of them after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Then, after his daughter died in a tragic automobile accident, he re-evaluated his position on abortion and stopped doing abortions.

Today, Dr. Levatino told members of a Congressional committee that they should support a bill sponsored by Rep. Trent Franks that would ban abortions nationwide aft 20 weeks of pregnancy.

Friday, January 25, 2013

The Dismantling of the 2nd Amendment

With all of the debates on gun control which are happening around the nation on:

  • Who’s to blame for mass murders?
  • Why does anyone need a gun?
  • How can we protect the children?
  • What’s the need for mega-sized magazines for guns?
  • This isn’t the 17th Century and the Founders wouldn’t approve of citizen’s having high powered, military style weapons today.
  • We’ve got to register and restrict gun ownership, because guns are too dangerous.

Heard it before?  We’ll hear it again and again, I fear, because we’ve abdicated our responsibility to teach our children how to use and respect guns.  We’ve failed to teach our children that life is precious above all else.  We’ve allowed a culture of death and violence to permeate every aspect of so-called, entertainment to occupy our minds at leisure.  There is an apparent concerted effort between progressives in the media and politics to use fear to control us.

The 2nd Amendment was not written to make certain man would always be capable of feeding themselves, but to insure that man would always be capable of defending themselves from criminals and tyrannical government.

“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

We the People have nothing to fear from a moral and well educated populace.  We the People should be watchful that an ever growing and powerful government does not enable itself to be our Father, Mother, Teacher, Warden and Priest.Nra Gun Control

The author of the post below, David Mamet, is a self-professed, born-again conservative.  David’s journey from progressive to conservative was a long struggle that he wrote about in his recently published book; “The Secret Knowledge on the Dismantling of American Culture.”  David’s latest published article in Newsweek sums up a lot of why we must resist the urge to give over our freedom and liberty to Big Government.

YiT ~  Shelly


In Newsweek Magazine

Gun Laws and the Fools of Chelm†

Jan 29, 2013 12:00 AM EST

The individual is not only best qualified to provide his own personal defense, he is the only one qualified to do so. By David Mamet.

Karl Marx summed up Communism as “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” This is a good, pithy saying, which, in practice, has succeeded in bringing, upon those under its sway, misery, poverty, rape, torture, slavery, and death.

‘In announcing his gun control proposals, President Obama said that he was not restricting Second Amendment rights, but allowing other constitutional rights to flourish.’

For the saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia. The agency is called “The State,” and the motto, fleshed out, for the benefit of the easily confused must read “The State will take from each according to his ability: the State will give to each according to his needs.” “Needs and abilities” are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to “the State shall take, the State shall give.”

All of us have had dealings with the State, and have found, to our chagrin, or, indeed, terror, that we were not dealing with well-meaning public servants or even with ideologues but with overworked, harried bureaucrats. These, as all bureaucrats, obtain and hold their jobs by complying with directions and suppressing the desire to employ initiative, compassion, or indeed, common sense. They are paid to follow orders.

Rule by bureaucrats and functionaries is an example of the first part of the Marxist equation: that the Government shall determine the individual’s abilities.

As rules by the Government are one-size-fits-all, any governmental determination of an individual’s abilities must be based on a bureaucratic assessment of the lowest possible denominator.  Click here to read the full story.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Update on the status of the Whatcom County, Lake Whatcom Reconveyance and Common Sense from the County Executive

There was a semi-victory in preventing a natural resource treasure from being stolen and placed under the control of Whatcom Land Trust (an NGO) to be forever restricted from public input and used as a productive and resourceful area that the birds, bees, flowers, trees and humans all enjoy and benefit from.  NGO’s are beholden to the United Nations “Agenda for the 21st Century,” aka Agenda 21.

Click on the image below to go to the editorial at “The Whatcom Excavator.”  If you are not already a regular reader of “WE” (the Whatcom Excavator), you should be.  The articles are insightful and packed with substantiated information that individual property owners and residents of this county need to know.

YiT ~ Shelly


Picture

MSU SDS Reunion: Bernadine Dohrn speaks

It’s been four years since I originally found this video.  With the coming election, it’s time to remind everyone who was sucked into the mantra of “Hope and Change” to understand where this mantra first originated.

President Obama has denied a cozy relationship with the Ayers, but I challenged that comment after I found this video during the 2008 election, where Ms. Dohrn uses the “Hope and Change” jingle throughout her speech.  Listen to their words of hope to change the United States into a lesser power, both economically and militarily.

If the world would be a better place without the United States as a moral leader, then why is the fighting and oppression of those liberated countries in ascension instead of decline.  The world has enjoyed a lot of peace over the past 200 years, in-between spates of wars and world wars.  Have we forgotten how tyranny always devolves to despotism?  Ultimate power, ultimately corrupts and anyone who leads under a soviet stylized system of “apex,” top down control, will devolve to leadership that will oppress the individual for the collectivist utopia of “what’s good for the goose must be good for the gander.”  Eventually the freedom to build and create will be snuffed out as we raise generations of humans unwilling or unable to think outside of a box and see that they’ve been wrapped-up into a prison of our own making.

YiT ~ Shelly

MSU SDS Reunion: Bernadine Dohrn featured speaker (Part 1)

MSU SDS Reunion: Bernadine Dohrn featured speaker (Part 2)

MSU SDS Reunion: Bill Ayers featured speaker (Part 1)

MSU SDS Reunion: Bill Ayers featured speaker (Part 2)

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Rosa Koire of “Democrats Against Agenda 21” speaking at WWU

Rosa Koire, the author of “Behind the Green Mask” and the originator of the website, “Democrats Against Agenda 21,” will be speaking at WWU’s Arntzen Hall, on October 21st at 7:00 pm.

Don’t miss this opportunity to hear her message, ask her the questions that need to be asked and spread the knowledge.

YiT ~ Shelly


A21 Koire

Monday, July 30, 2012

“DiscovertheNetworks.org”; An amazing tool to research and find how the Political Left is interconnected and funded

Straight from David Horowitz.  For those of you who do not already know David Horowitz, he is a former activist for the left.  David was raised by communist parents, and had his own awakening when the US left the Vietnam War.  Once the US military was gone and no longer a threat, the people left behind were slaughtered by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.  The activist, leadership of the left, showed no compassion or anger at a “communist” regime’s massacre of it’s own people.  So had he been fighting for a lie?

Yes, Mr. Horowitz, now understood the empty, inhumane and ruthless nature of the movement he had helped.  Since that time he has worked tirelessly to expose the Progressive’s and with this website, he helps you to see the connections, too.  The website is: “DiscovertheNetworks.org.” 

Mr. Horowitz also works under the organization HorowitzFreedomCenter.org, which helps to keep us connected with others who strive to “drain the swamp,” as Nancy Pelosi so adoringly coined.

Use it.  Enjoy it.  Share it.  We the People must expose how they’ve been working in harmony to rustle, wrangle and corral us towards the cliff.

YiT ~  Shelly


Thursday, July 12, 2012

Does COB Councilman Lilliquist (and others) serve two governments against our individual, Constitutional protections?

Last week, the Bellingham Herald published the full letter of Michael Lilliquist’s response to an un-named supporter/promoter of “Coal Free Bellingham” and the “Bellingham Community Bill of Rights.”

Mr. Lilliquists letter is long and twisted with regret that he (and other Council Members) had to reject the “Bellingham Community Bill of Rights”l for the November 2012 ballot.  If you stuck it out to and read to the bitter end of Lilliquist’s letter, you find that he vows to actively work to find some form of the “Coal Free” initiative “and” the “Community Bill of Rights”, are brought to a vote in Bellingham (and next Whatcom County). 

This is the slow drip of progressive, communitarianism, also known as communism.  This type of initiative promotes a “new” form of government and promotes sedition.

Is it legal for Councilman Lilliquist (and any elected official) to do?  Is it moral of him to do this?  I am asking…is this legal and/or moral…to have our elected representatives actively work to destroy our representative form of government?

YiT ~  Shelly


This is a pasting of the “last” two paragraphs from Councilman Lilliquist’s letter to an un-revealed recipient/supporter of the “Bellingham Community Bill of Rights”:

On Monday, I formally notified the other members of the City Council that I wanted to work on developing alternative ballot proposals to be put before the people, to address the coal train issues and the Community Bill of Rights in a way that would not be legally challengeable. Several council members quickly said that they would help me to develop those ideas. If the court decides that Prop 2 is invalid, the Council may be able to place alternatives on the ballot if we act quickly. Nothing has been decided or proposed yet, but the Council could choose to place two advisory votes on the ballot, one issue dealing with the coal train issue and the other dealing with a Community Bill of rights. As advisory votes rather than laws, these cannot be challenged or overturned. On the down side, of course, because they are not laws, they do not actually change the system or enact new legal tools.

At the same time, I will continue to work with the city administration to participate in a robust environmental review by the county, to identify all impacts and to hold the GPT applicants accountable. The permit review process will take months if not years. Please be assured that I will give the matter the attention and time that it deserves.”

(Link to pdf version of Lilliquist’s full statement)

Tags: Bellingham, City Council, coal, Energy, environment, Gateway Pacific Terminal, Whatcom

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Rosa Koire ~ Huffington Post Interview on A21

Just had to share this video, front and center of my blog.  If you enjoy this video as much as I did, please share it.  The more we expose the fallacy of A21, the more we defend liberty and freedom for ourselves and our future.

Rosa will be speaking at WWU next fall.  Attendance is going to be high and highly recommended!

YiT ~  Shelly


Rosa Koire, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, being interviewed by Andrew Reinbach, Huffington Post columnist for an article on opposition to UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. Reinbach baited Rosa, put words into her mouth, asked her if she was 'afraid that she would be tarred with the same brush as the John Birch Society', and tried to suggest that zoning and UN Agenda 21 are the same thing. Rosa resisted his efforts to marginalize her and the fight against this blueprint for world inventory and control.
At the end of the interview Rosa asked Reinbach if he was recording the interview and when he said he was, she told him that she also was recording it. This is probably why he didn't quote her or mention her in his biased article. Here's the link to the May 17, 2012 Huffington Post article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-reinbach/agenda-21-sustainability-_b_152...

Friday, April 20, 2012

Happy “Lenin” ‘er, “Earth Day” to Humanity from Mother Earth

Happy “Earth Day” to everyone.  No really!  Happy Earth Day!  On April 22nd, of each year, our country blindly celebrates their worship of Mother Earth (Gaia) and the communitarianism “we” all share in honoring her.  But, do you know where “Earth Day” originates from and why the date of April 22nd was chosen to celebrate this event?

God bless you Mother Earth.  The miracle we call earth and the miracle of humanity are worthy of celebration.  But really, should it be modeled after the despot, statist, Lenin?

YiT ~  Shelly


DO YOU KNOW WHY EARTH DAY IS APRIL 22?

Clue: It didn't start as celebration of butterflies, recycling and solar energy

Vladimir32

By Kevin DeAnna

School children, businesses, clergy, politicians and even the United States military soon will honor the birthday of Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union.

Of course, they will call it Earth Day.

Brian Sussman points out in his explosive new book, “Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda will Dismantle America,” that the first nationwide Earth Day was held April 22, 1970, the 100th anniversary of the birth of the communist Bolshevik leader.

The “nationwide teach in” was spearheaded by Democratic Sen. Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin and college professor Paul Ehrlich.

Read the full story here.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Is this Crony Capitalism or Crony Socialism

When the argument is made that there is an unholy alliance between our local, publicly elected representatives and Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s), like Sustainable Connections, Futurewise, the Opportunity Council, ReSources for Sustainable Communities (see an underlining theme here?), we were not kidding.

It has recently come to my attention that there was a large hand-out given to “Sustainable Connections and The Opportunity Council” of federal stimulus funds from the Department of Energy (DOE).  These funds were tagged for the Community Enercy Challenge (CEC), granted to our Whatcom County government, to be administered through Banner Bank, a local bank.  These funds were expected to fly out the doors as small businesses and private individuals scooped up the $467,000.00 of grant money available for Whatcom County.  After approximately 2+ years, they had only given out 20% of these funds.  So, what did the Whatcom County Council, with the blessings of the Whatcom County Executive do?  They gave the remaining 80% of these funds over to Sustainable Connections and the Opportunity Council to give-away.

As I listen to the local radio stations, I hear numerous radio ads telling people how they can get “free” money to use for “green” energy projects and get “free” energy credits for years to come.  News flash; “Nothing is free!”  This money cost somebody, something and the funds came from the unspent stimulus package, that should’ve gone back to help pay down the skyrocketing debt our local, state and federal government is racking up.  Who is going to pay that debt?  The politicians who so blithely give it away?  No!  Those of us who actually pay taxes will be on the hook for every blessed penny.

Now before you say; “So what?”  Remember, the Whatcom County Council is obligated to make the distribution of these funds public.  Sustainable Connections and the Opportunity Council, are not required to make the distribution of these funds public.  Now the DOE has the authority to audit these funds, but that does not make this a transparent transaction for you and I to see that this money is spent as required.

When the public coffers are ripe with mismanagement, we are broke, TEA’d off, and frustrated by the unfettered spending in government at all levels, how come this continues to happen?

Well take a look at the Whatcom County Council’s own memo presented to the Whatcom County Council budget appropriations meeting, by the County Executive.

Now take a look at this screen shot from the Executive’s campaign website that has been saved for posterity.

Is this crony capitalism, or crony socialism?  I say, crony socialism, because these NGO’s are shutting down the U.S. Constitution, the Washington State Constitution, Whatcom County Charter and Bellingham City Charter, as they were originally written to promote growth, freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as inalienable rights of all “free” citizens.  How is this done?  Through fiscal, social manipulation of the tax dollars, which are increasingly used to pick life’s winners and losers.  No longer is it the hard work of an individual that gets rewarded.  It is whomever and however you can convince these NGO’s and their complicit political partners (PPP’s) to give tax dollars to the chosen few.

YiT,  Shelly


image   Louws & Sustainable Connections

I ask you to decide, did Whatcom County elect a true conservative who is dedicated to protect and defend your rights as a “private individual”?  Or, did Whatcom County elect a County Executive dedicated to “the Collective”?

Thursday, January 19, 2012

What Motivates Obama?

I am not a big fan of Dick Morris, but this video clip put out by Mr. Morris, is the best encapsulation of what’s happened the past three years.

What Mr. Morris says here, goes hand in glove with the conclusions of Fredrich Hayek; “Socialism will never succeed over Capitalism unless it is done on a global basis.”  Hayek’s studies also proved another dire consequence of Socialism (Marxism and Communism, not excluded) is that it “always” ends in TYRANNY!

Mr. Morris’s theory also aligns with the goals of the United Nations for Agenda 21, if you understand that Agenda 21 is merely a global effort to create a global government of choice, which is “Socialism on a global scale”.  Can any of you say, “New World Order”?

The biggest challenge we have today is, which of the other Presidential Candidates will remove the United States from the United Nations and leave Agenda 21 in ashes.  They cannot successfully implement Agenda 21 without the United States, and the U.S. Constitution is our only protection from their end game.

Please watch the video and especially if you agree that this is the explanation of what has, is and will happen to the United States economic system, please share this far and wide.

YiT,  Shelly


What Motivates Obama?

Sunday, January 15, 2012

On this MLK Holiday weekend we should ask; “Can C.L. Bryant’s view help to restore Race Relations, the Constitution and Prosperity in America?”

C.L. Bryant has collaborated with Matte Kibbe of “FreedomWorks.org” to make the documentary movie; “Runaway Slave”.

As a former NAACP leader, C.L. Bryant chronicles the American Black’s voyage from the black underground perspective of the Civil War through the 1960’s (pre JFK) as a voting block for the Republican Party, and the gains to their economic and social progress in America.  Sans the Dr. Martin Luther King era and John F Kennedy’s presidency, when former President Lyndon Johnson made social welfare a household word, the “black vote” has gone 95% to the Democrat Party.  According to the findings of Dr. Bryant, the economic and social advances in the black community have been in decline due to their blind allegiance to a Party that has indoctrinated generations of black families to worship the benevolence of government welfare.  A government that socially manipulates (dictates) behavior to keep the gravy train of welfare dollars coming to them, with acceptable behavior and the votes to perpetuate this system.

Since this weekend is in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, I believe Dr. Bryant’s video here and a link to the trailer of his video; “Runaway Slave”, is the time to remind us all that the way it is now, is not as it has always been.

YiT,  Shelly


Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Obama’s EPA continues to over reach. Now they want control over your puddles and ditches!

File:Statueofliberty.JPGThere has been talk of neutering the EPA by many of the current GOP, Presidential Candidates.  History has shown us that any human entity, if given enough time and power, will always begin to meddle and abuse their power.  Whether it is from a lack of anything more purposeful to do, and a need to show others that they deserve the power that’s been given to them.  Or, from a truly sincere (albeit misplaced) desire to do good.  The EPA has been and continues to run roughshod over the Constitution and “everyone’s” rights of property as protected and upheld by the Supreme Court.

Currently the EPA is destroying the viable energy sources with their interpretation of “Global Warming” and Co2 emissions.  Now, they plan to do the same by re-interpreting what “bodies” of water the Federal government has the right(s) to regulate.

Truth is always scarier than fiction.  First they came for the control of your money, then they came for the control of your air, presently they are gaining control and locking up the land and shortly they will do the same to your water.  All of these elements are integral to the US Citizen’s “Rights of Property”.

Okay, I am saying it again! Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development, is stealing “the American Dream”.  Please, let’s clean house of these globalists who have corrupted the Constitution to the point that the Youth are being lied to in our Sus Devp (small)public schools and won’t even know what true freedom and liberty is.

YiT,  Shelly


Obama Administration and EPA Use Clean Water Act for New Overreach

Prepare To Have That Puddle in Your Back Yard Regulated.

Posted by Ben Howe (Diary)

Monday, November 21st at 5:00PM EST

Just as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has used the Clean Air Act to broaden the scope of their authority way beyond its original intention with rules like MACT and

CSAPR, the Clean Water Act is becoming a tool of overreach by the out of control agency.

Barack Obama and the EPA’s Lisa Jackson have made it clear through their actions that they will circumvent the legislature by using regulatory enforcement to enact Obama’s green dreams, and now it seems that circumvention includes the Supreme Court of the United States.

During the Bush presidency, a series of Supreme Court decisions acknowledged the limits of reach for the Clean Water Act. Most notably, the Supreme Court clarified that federal jurisdiction did not extend to wetlands and other “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act.  Through the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Country v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2001) and Raponos v. U.S. (2006) the Supreme Court established that private property rights still mattered even in light of the Clean Water Act and that the federal government did not have authority over them.

This of course isn’t stopping Barack Obama and Lisa Jackson from moving forward anyway.  Click here to read the full story.


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

OWS~Anit-Capitalist in the Military?

This is a very recent YouTube clip from OWS where they are having “Teach-Ins” that espouse anti-capitalism.  This video has a moment of truth that the progressive/communist/socialist/marxist/ecologarcists have infiltrated all sectors of government, including our U.S. Military.  The U.S. Military is empowered to protect the U.S. Constitution and should never be allowed to have this type of rhetoric taught to those entrusted to protect the Country.Sus Devp (small)

Just my thoughts…enjoy the video.

YiT,  Shelly


OWS Teach-In for Anti-Capitalism

Monday, November 7, 2011

The Mob Rule’s of Occupiers in DC

The Occupiers of “Occupy Washington DC” this weekend apparently took their protest to the annual meeting of Americans for Prosperity.  The AFP organization was instrumental in getting many petitions served onto the politicians as they crammed through the PPACA, and they fought hard for transparency in the process of the Health Care bill’s passage.

The first video is of a handicapped woman who wishes to leave the building, but is prevented from doing so because of the protestors blockade.

The second video is of the same evening, different moment in time, where protestors used children to cause a blockade.  The videographer tries to question why anyone would bring children and expose them to this type of potential harm.  Since a lot of these protests have degraded into violence, it does not make sense that a “caring'” parent would be so irresponsible.  This definitely looks like child abuse to me.

YiT,  Shelly


Handicapped Woman prevented from leaving building by Occupy Washington DC’ers

Occupy Washington DC’ers use young children in their blockade of building

More Pigs at the Trough: “The Price of Free Corn”, by Steve Washam

So tell me, are you able to understand the similarity between the story I’ve posted below and the Occupier’s around the World?

YiT,  Shelly


By Steve Washam, based on a telling by George Gordon

In a realistic style, this story illustrates what the U.S. government and the UN are doing to the people of America and the  world. When thinking of Constitutional violations by our  politicians, think of this parable.

Some years ago, about 1900, an old trapper from North Dakota hitched up some horses to his Studebaker wagon, packed a few  possessions, especially his traps -- and drove south.

Several weeks later he stopped in a small town just north of the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia. It was a Saturday morning -- a lazy day -- when he walked into the general store. Sitting around the pot-bellied stove were seven or eight of the town's local citizens.

The traveler spoke, "Gentlemen, could you direct me to the Okefenokee Swamp?"

Some of the old-timers looked at him like he was crazy. "You must be a stranger in these parts," they said.

"I am. I'm from North Dakota," said the stranger.

"In the Okefenokee Swamp are thousands of wild hogs," one old man explained. "A man who goes into the swamp by himself asks to die!"

He lifted up his leg. "I lost half my leg here, to the pigs of the swamp."

Another old fellow said, "Look at the cuts on me; look at my arm bit off!"

"Those pigs have been free since the Revolution, eating snakes and rooting out roots and fending for themselves for over a hundred years. They're wild and they're dangerous. You can't trap them. No  man dare go into the swamp by himself."

Every man nodded his head in agreement.

The old trapper said, "Thank you so much for the warning. Now  could you direct me to the swamp?"

They said, "Well, yeah, it's due south -- straight down the road." But they begged the stranger not to go, because they knew he'd  meet a terrible fate.

He said, "Sell me ten sacks of corn, and help me load them into  the wagon."

And they did.

Then the old trapper bid them farewell and drove on down the road. The townsfolk thought they'd never see him again. Two weeks later  the man came back. He pulled up to the general store, got down off  the wagon, walked in and bought ten more sacks of corn. After  loading it up he went back down the road toward the swamp.

Two weeks later he returned and, again, bought ten sacks of corn. This went on for a month. And then two months, and three. Every  week or two the old trapper would come into town on a Saturday  morning, load up ten sacks of corn and drive off south into the  swamp.

The stranger soon became a legend in the little village and the subject of much speculation. People wondered what kind of devil  had possessed this man, that he could go into the Okefenokee by  himself and not be consumed by the wild and free hogs.

One morning the man came into town as usual. Everyone thought he wanted more corn. He got off the wagon and went into the store  where the usual group of men were gathered around the stove. He  took off his gloves.

"Gentlemen," he said, "I need to hire about ten or fifteen wagons. I need twenty or thirty men. I have six thousand hogs out in the swamp, penned up, and they're all hungry. I've got to get them to  market right away."

"You've WHAT in the swamp?" asked the storekeeper,  incredulously.

"I have six thousand hogs penned up. They haven't eaten for two or three days, and they'll starve if I don't get back there to feed and take care of them."

One of the old-timers said, "You mean you've captured the wild  hogs of the Okefenokee?"

"That's right."

"How did you do that? What did you do?" the men urged, breathlessly.

One of them exclaimed, "But I lost my arm!"

"I lost my brother!" cried another.

"I lost my leg to those wild boars!" chimed a third.

The trapper said, "Well, the first week I went in there they were wild all right. They hid in the undergrowth and wouldn't come out.  I dared not get off the wagon. So I spread corn along behind the  wagon. Every day I'd spread a sack of corn.

"The old pigs would have nothing to do with it. But the younger pigs decided that it was easier to eat free corn than it was to  root out roots and catch snakes. So the very young began to eat  the corn first.

"I did this every day. Pretty soon, even the old pigs decided that it was easier to eat free corn, after all, they were all free;  they were not penned up. They could run off in any direction they  wanted at any time.

"The next thing was to get them used to eating in the same place all the time. So, I selected a clearing, and I started putting the  corn in the clearing.

"At first they wouldn't come to the clearing. It was too far. It was too open. It was a nuisance to them.

"But the very young decided that it was easier to take the corn in the clearing than it was to root out roots and catch their own  snakes. And not long thereafter, the older pigs also decided that  it was easier to come to the clearing every day.

"And so the pigs learned to come to the clearing every day to get their free corn. They could still subsidize their diet with roots  and snakes and whatever else they wanted. After all, they were all  free. They could run in any direction at any time. There were no  bounds upon them.

"The next step was to get them used to fence posts. So I put fence posts all the way around the clearing. I put them in the  underbrush so that they wouldn't get suspicious or upset, after  all, they were just sticks sticking up out of the ground, like the  trees and the brush. The corn was there every day. It was easy to  walk in between the posts, get the corn, and walk back out.

"This went on for a week or two. Shortly they became very used to walking into the clearing, getting the free corn, and walking back out through the fence posts.

"The next step was to put one rail down at the bottom. I also left a few openings, so that the older, fatter pigs could walk through the openings and the younger pigs could easily jump over just one  rail, after all, it was no real threat to their freedom or  independence they could always jump over the rail and flee in  any direction at any time.

"Now I decided that I wouldn't feed them every day. I began to  feed them every other day. On the days I didn't feed them, the  pigs still gathered in the clearing. They squealed, and they  grunted, and they begged and pleaded with me to feed them -- but I  only fed them every other day. Then I put a second rail around the  posts.”

"Now the pigs became more and more desperate for food. Because now they were no longer used to going out and digging their own roots  and finding their own food, they now needed me. They needed my  corn every other day.

"So I trained them that I would feed them every day if they came  in through a gate and I put up a third rail around the fence. But it was still no great threat to their freedom, because there were several gates and they could run in and out at will. Finally I put up the fourth rail. Then I closed all the gates but one, and I fed them very, very well."

"Yesterday I closed the last gate and today I need you to help me take these pigs to market."

The price of free corn.


The parable of the pigs has a serious moral lesson. This story is about federal money being used to bait, trap and enslave a once  free and independent people.

Federal welfare, in its myriad forms, has reduced not only individuals to a state of dependency; state and local governments  are also on the fast track to elimination, due to their functions  being subverted by the command and control structures of federal  "revenue sharing" programs.

Please copy this parable and send it to all of your state and  local elected leaders and other concerned citizens. Tell them" Just  say NO to federal corn."

The bacon you save, may be your own.


Occupy Whatcom County Council supported by Councilman Mann??? and City Council Candidate Cathy Lehman???

As always, their words speak louder than mine.Sus Devp (small)

YiT,  Shelly


Occupy Whatcom County Council

Share · Public Event

Wednesday, November 9 · 6:30pm - 9:00pm


Location

Walk from Maritime to County Courthouse

311 Grand Ave

Bellingham, WA


Created By

#occupybellingham


More Info

We need 99 people to gather at the #OB Encampment at 6:30. There will be a brief orientation at the encampment, and then an even more brief walk from the Encampment to the Whatcom County Courthouse... where there will be warmth. Warmth and democracy.
Each person is allowed 3 minutes to speak about any issue they feel is important.

Wall
  • Carrie Lynn

    What will the orientation be about?

    Like · · 5 hours ago

  • Richard May

    while it may be permissable to speak on "any issue", it would be highly helpful if occupy folks would aim for a focused, constructive, specific complaint or demand, so that the general public would have a better chance to understand and learn what the fuss is about.

    Like · · 13 hours ago
  • Shane M Roth

    It is my experience that there is always at least one representative of the 1% at County Council meetings. There needs to be at least 99 representatives from the 99% to achieve equity of attendance at County Council events.

    Like · · 21 hours ago
  • Iris Maute-Gibson

    I'm unfortunately going to be out of town; stay warm and fierce!

    Like · · 23 hours ago
  • Cathy Lehman

    I'll be speaking in the public hearing (and possibly in the open session as well) on behalf of Futurewise. Sounds like we're gonna pull an all-nighter! I'm game.

    Like · · Yesterday at 9:28am
  • Ken Mann

    Technically, I'll be attending...

    Like · · Yesterday at 9:12am
    • 5 people like this.

      • Shane M Roth Ken is excused because he will be in a meeting at 6:30... nonetheless, he will be in the Encampment in spirit.

        Yesterday at 9:26am · Like