Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Doctor Who Did 1,200 Abortions Tells Congress to Ban Them

Through the many years I have been posting here, I have not posted any articles that are pro or anti-abortion.  This site is dedicated to highlight progressive policies that I believe are deleterious to “We the People.”  Today I found an article through The Drudge Report that could change a lot of minds on the topic of abortion.

Now I want to bring you back to what’s happening with Obamacare and the mandate by this abuse of power, that all insurers must provide abortion coverage.

Please read and share this article with others.  It could mean life or death for many innocent lives to come.

YiT ~  Shelly


Doctor Who Did 1,200 Abortions Tells Congress to Ban Them

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/23/13 12:52 PM

Dr. Anthony Levatino is a pro-life physician from New Mexico but, before having a change of heart on the issue of abortion he was an OBGYN who also performed abortions.

Levatino did as many as 1,200 abortions — some of them after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Then, after his daughter died in a tragic automobile accident, he re-evaluated his position on abortion and stopped doing abortions.

Today, Dr. Levatino told members of a Congressional committee that they should support a bill sponsored by Rep. Trent Franks that would ban abortions nationwide aft 20 weeks of pregnancy.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Elections have consequences

After the 2012 Presidential Election, the actions of an overt and zealous administrations is set to pump-up the adrenalin.  To finish the work of FDR, Wilson, Johnson and Obama.  Yes, I know that there have been many Republicans that have capitulated to the progressive move towards collectivism.  The go along – to get along has been an abysmal mistake on the part of many.

Here a just a few of the many things to come.  After all that happened in the last four years, do you even know what had been put on hold until after the election?

Yes, “We the People,” elections do have consequences!

YiT ~  Shelly


Thursday, November 24, 2011

Happy Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving is not only in remembrance of the feast of giving for the successful harvest of the Pilgrims and Indians, it is a moment to ponder what “we” are thankful for in our everyday lives.

This is my list of things I am most thankful for:

A healthy family

A family that each is able to pursue their dreams

A business that gives me time to spend with family and helping others

A functioning mind with which to read, learn, reason and teach

A body healthy enough to work and play

Friends who take time out for one another

Money enough to pay our bills, spoil the kids a little, and give some to charity

A home to shelter me and my family

A bed to rest my head on after a long day

The ability to go to a store and buy whatever my family needs, knowing that my money is helping others to do the same

The ability to understand the difference between “good” and “evil”

Faith that there is a supreme being looking over us all

And, the energy to get up everyday and look forward to what new challenges are out there for me and my family

There are many other things I am thankful for, but for now, I am off to spend time doing the things I am thankful for.  May you be blessed enough today to do the same and more.

YiT,  Shelly


BE023015

Sunday, September 18, 2011

The Constitution vs. Democracy School Teachings of “Mob Rule”

Local Ferndale, WA citizen, Bellingham Tea Party President, Karl Uppiano has published a well stated analysis of what’s being taught at the local Democracy School instruction vs. the U.S. Constitution’s protections of the minorities from mob rule.  The main ingredient missing from today’s political activities, is their upholding of the protections given to the individual from the “collectivist”, the “community”, the “globalists”, the “Gaia obsession” to place Mother Earth on a religious pedestal and teach that no human has the right to de-grade her in any way!  Is it naiveté that drives the Democracy School agenda?  Or, is it about the continual push towards full implementation of Agenda 21 through the auspices of  “Sustainable Development”?

Yours In Truth  Winking smile  Shelly


2011 National Constitution Week; by Karl Uppiano

On September 17, 1787, The Constitution of The United States was ratified. Saturday, September 17, 2011, on the 224th anniversary, kicks off National Constitution Week.

You might be interested to know that several of our local politicians attended a “Democracy School”, that teaches that The Constitution was a “usurpation” of the Articles of Confederation. To wit,

  1. The Mount Vernon Conference was convened to solve the problems encountered by the Potomac Company, and the Conference led to the Annapolis Convention, which sent a report to Congress urging for a broader meeting to be held in Philadelphia.
  2. Delegates to the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention were a select group representing property-owning white males, that the proceedings were secret and sentries were positioned at the doors, that Madison and Randolph presented the Virginia Plan on the first day, and that minutes of the Convention were not released for over 53 years.
  3. Most of the delegates viewed democracy as rule by the rabble, and called for the crafting of a Constitution that enabled a minority to govern, and which protected the property of the minority from majority governance.
  4. There were a group of people called the anti-federalists who understood what the delegates were attempting, and attempted to stop the ratification of the Constitution.
  5. The Constitution is an anti-majoritarian, slave document that established a minority-rule, slave state.

Please consider telling all of your elected representatives that we believe the un-revised history,

  1. The Articles of Confederation were weak, inhibiting the ability of the several states to cooperate, or even be recognized as a single nation by other countries, especially Great Britain. We were in danger of disintegration. The problems addressed by The Constitution were manifold, and they may have incidentally addressed or hindered various special interests.
  2. Property-owning white males is a modern construct used by statists to justify more centralized government, not a return to more diffuse states’ rights.
  3. The federalists believed that pure democracy suffers from “the tyranny of the majority”, in which minority rights would be overridden by the majority. They created a representative republic in an attempt to help protect minority rights.
  4. When The Constitution was being considered, there were federalists and anti-federalists. Political change always has opposition. As such, the tea parties oppose abandoning constitutional government, and certainly without due process.
  5. Most of the founders were federalists and abolitionists, believing in liberty and equal justice for all. The fact that The Constitution did not abolish slavery at the time was part of the great compromise that was necessary to get it ratified. When we finally did (thankfully) abolish slavery, it nearly destroyed The Union. At least we still had The Constitution.

The fact of the matter is that The Constitution was ratified, and for 224 years, it has helped to protect our right to live free, and keep what we earn. Regardless of how some would mischaracterize the founders and their motives, The Constitution is still the official specification for The United States government, and any regime that distorts or disregards the document that they took an oath to uphold and defend, is untrustworthy and dangerous.

To learn more, see the section The US Constitution on the Education page of this website.


Tuesday, February 22, 2011

The ABA's Jihad

While American patriots work hard to hold onto our personal, constitutional rights, the American Bar Association is readying itself to take on States who have approved anti-Sharia laws to supersede local, state and federal laws.  Time to take on the ABA and any public tax payer funds they have, are currently and may receive in the future?

Yours In Truth  Winking smile  Shelly

February 22, 2011

By Pamela Geller

The American Bar Association (ABA) has decided to undertake the fight for Sharia law. The ABA's Executive Counsel "has organized a Task Force to review the legislation of 14 states -- Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming -- in which anti-Sharia legislation has been introduced."

The goal of the ABA's Task Force is to fight against these legislative initiatives by free people, and to develop "an informal set of ‘talking points' that local opponents of these initiatives could use to make their case in each of these states."

Here's the relevant extract from the ABA's International Policies 2010:

Oklahoma referendum related Rule of Law initiatives.

The Section's Executive Counsel has organized a Task Force to review the legislation of 14 states -- Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming - in which anti-Sharia legislation has been introduced.  The goal of the Task Force is to have a Report and Recommendation against such legislation as well as an informal set of "talking points" that local opponents of these initiatives could use to make their case in each of these states.  We received a lot of interest from members and have forwarded your interest.  At this point, the task force is in the planning and organizing stage. We will keep you updated as to the progress and we may call upon some of you who expressed their interest in this matter to volunteer.

Read the full article by clicking here.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Sarah Palin Addresses the Arizona, Pima County Shooting

Sarah Palin has been an enigma to me.  On first glimpse I was enthusiastically encouraged to vote in 2008.  Yes, if not for Sarah Palin’s name on the ticket, I am not certain that I would’ve exercised my right to vote that year.  Further down the road I must admit that the sprinkling of dialectic Palinism’s began to grate upon me.  Not the words themselves, but the frequency with which she uses them.  I have sporadically watched the “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” series and must admit that it’s not high drama, but I have enjoyed the few that I did.

Now out of the blue, Sarah Palin has responded to the tragedy of the massacre in Arizona’s Pima County with true grace and clarity.  Please take a moment to listen to her words and ask yourself…was the election results of 2010 about real change?  Was a large part of the 2010 election results a reaction of an electorate who want to take back their rights through individual responsibility for individual actions?  I believe that it was and if we are to push back the stranglehold that the Federal Government has placed upon the States, the States have placed upon the Counties, the Counties have placed upon the Communities, we must take those responsibilities seriously.

When a lone person, who had demonstrated through a series of unstable actions, finally breaks, the buck stops there.  If people want to assign blame, they must start with the perpetrator and end with the perpetrator.  The mental health of our public is fragile and when people have outbursts that show cause for mental health observation, as a family or friend, don’t be afraid to reach out and ask to help them or seek out for them a safer place.  Our society does not allow for the institutionalizing of others without voluntary committal or an act of crime.  So, in the end it is always the responsibility of the individual to own what they have done.  When I take an action the buck stops with me!

Yours in Truth  Winking smile  Shelly

Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Glenn Beck Speaks at “Restoring Honor Rally”

I watched the rally from beginning to end.  This is what I heard and have taken away from the rally:

.."This great Nation is only great when we stand together, with God's grace, to live for and up to the Divine Providence all humans are blessed with".
It has always been within our power to be great. Thank you to Glenn Beck and all of the facilitators of this event, to remind us of this simple message.

Yours In Truth  ;-)

LiveJournal Tags: ,

Restoring Honor 8-28-10







Monday, August 16, 2010

Thomas Jefferson and the Ground Zero Mosque

This article puts a unique and relevant spin on the PC response to the erection of a Muslim Mosque within the Ground Zero property of Manhattan, NY.  Give this article a good look and tell me what you think.  It’s a perspective I hadn’t taken into consideration and one which leads back to the urgent need that all societies need to hold dearly to societal morality and integrity to survive.

Yours In Truth  ;-)  Shelly

By Gary DeMar |

Published: August 16, 2010

President Obama stepped into it over the weekend. Speaking Friday August 13, 2010, at a White House dinner to honor Ramadan, the President told his audience, “Muslims have the right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country,” an obvious reference to the controversy surrounding the Ground Zero mosque. On Saturday, while spending the day in the Gulf, the president attempted to clarify his earlier remarks: “I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”

Utah’s attempts at statehood were held up over the religious practice of polygamy. It wasn’t until Utah agreed to include in its constitution a ban on polygamy that the territory was considered for statehood. Statehood was officially granted on January 4, 1896.

Prior to Utah’s statehood, the Supreme Court had ruled that “Bigamy and polygamy are crimes by the laws of all civilized and Christian countries”[1] and “the spread and practice of polygamy is . . . . contrary to the spirit of Christianity and of the civilization which Christianity has produced in the Western world.”[2] So contrary to President Obama, it’s not true that all people have “the right to practice their religion.” The First Amendment does not give unlimited freedom to individuals or groups who act in the name of religion, especially when that religion’s goal is the domination of the world or even a part of it by force.

Click here to read the full story.